<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>普通の不労愚</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>An idle blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:00:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='atinimoodyman.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="普通の不労愚" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Anthropologising history and historicising social sciences</title>
		<link>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2012/01/13/anthropologising-history-and-historicising-social-sciences/</link>
		<comments>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2012/01/13/anthropologising-history-and-historicising-social-sciences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mo, R. Y.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/?p=562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anthropologising history and historicising social sciences do not constitute an antithesis. If it appears so, it is only because we confuse ourselves. A confusion pretty much the same as the dichotomy between man and nature, and social and natural sciences. The anthropologist, by arguing and believing that knowing our contemporary situation help us understand the <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=atinimoodyman.wordpress.com&amp;blog=4749977&amp;post=562&amp;subd=atinimoodyman&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2012/01/13/anthropologising-history-and-historicising-social-sciences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f895081223e2f4cdeece5b0f1047a4d3?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Roger</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the distribution of imagination</title>
		<link>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/08/19/on-the-distribution-of-imagination/</link>
		<comments>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/08/19/on-the-distribution-of-imagination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mo, R. Y.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aesthetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[直接経験]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[西田幾多郎]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Locke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/?p=543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[後で書く Points to make: 1. To what extent can one argue that the rules of intuition belong solely to sensibility? 2. To what extent can one argue that the categories of original apperception belong to the understanding alone? 3. Or, do these two questions simply not make sense at all? 4. Does the negative answer <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=atinimoodyman.wordpress.com&amp;blog=4749977&amp;post=543&amp;subd=atinimoodyman&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/08/19/on-the-distribution-of-imagination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f895081223e2f4cdeece5b0f1047a4d3?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Roger</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>何をやって行けばよいか</title>
		<link>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/07/29/%e4%bd%95%e3%82%92%e3%82%84%e3%81%a3%e3%81%a6%e8%a1%8c%e3%81%91%e3%81%b0%e3%82%88%e3%81%84%e3%81%8b/</link>
		<comments>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/07/29/%e4%bd%95%e3%82%92%e3%82%84%e3%81%a3%e3%81%a6%e8%a1%8c%e3%81%91%e3%81%b0%e3%82%88%e3%81%84%e3%81%8b/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mo, R. Y.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/?p=550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[始まりは社会学、理論社会学、政治哲学辺りでしたが、それから段々それらを問題視してきて、今はもう完全に認識論や形而上学に陥ったのですね。それだけ今やってることを続けられるかは分かりませんが、その基礎を無くしては本来の分野に戻ることも無意味なのでしょう。現在考え直してみれば、オックスフォードで現代日本社会研究をすることには、僕は向いてないかもしれませんね。そこらへんで出来るのは現代思想史しかないのですが、やはりそれが一番関心に近いからね、まずその史的方法をこなすにほかならない。まあ、別の道もあるのだが、例えば政治学とか社会学とかを、それらの方法論を中心にやっていくということ。とは言え、指導教師がどれほどこういうやり方に賛成してくれるかは疑問ですし、実験科学的なリサーチもやらねばならぬ。というところにはやっぱ引っかかっちゃうがちなので、あえてその道をやめることにしました。今日は『善の研究』第二編を読んでいます。 Filed under: Diary<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=atinimoodyman.wordpress.com&amp;blog=4749977&amp;post=550&amp;subd=atinimoodyman&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/07/29/%e4%bd%95%e3%82%92%e3%82%84%e3%81%a3%e3%81%a6%e8%a1%8c%e3%81%91%e3%81%b0%e3%82%88%e3%81%84%e3%81%8b/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f895081223e2f4cdeece5b0f1047a4d3?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Roger</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Traditional Metaphysics</title>
		<link>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/07/21/traditional-metaphysics/</link>
		<comments>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/07/21/traditional-metaphysics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 08:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mo, R. Y.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aesthetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[カント哲学]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Hume]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Descartes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hegel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kantianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[哲学]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/?p=536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That Kant&#8217;s Critique of Pure Reason still falls within the bounds of traditional metaphysics can be inferred from the statement that occurs at the very outset of the work: The effect of an object on the capacity for representation, insofar as we are affected by it, is sensation. That intuition which is related to the object through <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=atinimoodyman.wordpress.com&amp;blog=4749977&amp;post=536&amp;subd=atinimoodyman&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/07/21/traditional-metaphysics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f895081223e2f4cdeece5b0f1047a4d3?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Roger</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>ブログは本当に不労愚になっちゃう</title>
		<link>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/07/02/%e3%83%96%e3%83%ad%e3%82%b0%e3%81%af%e6%9c%ac%e5%bd%93%e3%81%ab%e4%b8%8d%e5%8a%b4%e6%84%9a%e3%81%ab%e3%81%aa%e3%81%a3%e3%81%a1%e3%82%83%e3%81%86/</link>
		<comments>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/07/02/%e3%83%96%e3%83%ad%e3%82%b0%e3%81%af%e6%9c%ac%e5%bd%93%e3%81%ab%e4%b8%8d%e5%8a%b4%e6%84%9a%e3%81%ab%e3%81%aa%e3%81%a3%e3%81%a1%e3%82%83%e3%81%86/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 06:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mo, R. Y.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Philosphy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hayek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kantianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[von Mises]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/?p=522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[六月に何も書いていないね。 二日間前に全体主義の政治思想のテストを終え、意外と簡単だった。噂によれば先生が問題用紙を書いてる頃、寝てしまったらしい。まあ、主になってる前半のリーディイングは ルートヴィヒ・フォン・ミーゼス『Omnipotent Government: The Rise of the Total State』 フリードリヒ・アウグスト・フォン・ハイエク『隷従への道――全体主義と自由』 カール・ライムント・ポッパー『開かれた社会とその敵　vol. 1 &#38; 2』『歴史主義の貧困』 五冊だったけど、二冊しか読んでいない気がするね。ミーゼスとハイエクは殆ど同じ立場だから。ポッパーの三冊もほぼ一緒。それゆえ、テストを易しくするべからざるとは思った。にも拘らず…ああぁ そもそもなぜこの五冊を選んだか。私の臆見だが、先生は学生の気持ちを配慮してるのではないかと。或はその逆か。っていうのは、先生も、その三人の著者は例外なしに親イギリス派だからです。それとも両方に理由があるかもしれませんね。それに加えて、図書館の蔵書は少なさ過ぎることも原因となってるんでしょうね。 ミーゼスの『Omnipotent Government』は和訳がないらしいだが、それは理解できる、訳す価値がないから。一つ、彼は「市場の失敗」をまったく信じない。もう一つ、純粋な理論的経済学にすぎない。それに、その時代に流行ってた「論理実証主義」に影響されてた故に、前後矛盾しているところが多い。彼は、確かにリカードを引用した記憶があるので、それはかなり、方法論的にはおかしすぎる。 「論理実証主義」に於いては、ハイエクもポッパーも同じ気がします。『歴史主義の貧困』の最後の３０−３１セクションだけが、そんなに悪くないと思われる。しかし、『開かれた社会とその敵』と同じように、「唯名論」と「本質主義」との区別は甘過ぎるのではないかと思わせる。要するに、その二つの極端の間に「概念化」と「視点」という認識論上の欠くべからざる一般概念が論ざれていないことである。 後半のは殆どアレントのもので、少しは面白くなると考えられる。テストはもう受けないつもりだが、エッセイを書くことにした。ずっとアレントに興味を持ってたからね。 Filed under: Diary, Epistemology, Methodology, Policy, Political Philosphy Tagged: Economics, Epistemology, Hayek, Kantianism, Methodology, Popper, von Mises<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=atinimoodyman.wordpress.com&amp;blog=4749977&amp;post=522&amp;subd=atinimoodyman&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/07/02/%e3%83%96%e3%83%ad%e3%82%b0%e3%81%af%e6%9c%ac%e5%bd%93%e3%81%ab%e4%b8%8d%e5%8a%b4%e6%84%9a%e3%81%ab%e3%81%aa%e3%81%a3%e3%81%a1%e3%82%83%e3%81%86/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f895081223e2f4cdeece5b0f1047a4d3?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Roger</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some very brief notes on Totalitarianism and Democracy</title>
		<link>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/05/25/some-very-brief-notes-on-totalitarianism-and-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/05/25/some-very-brief-notes-on-totalitarianism-and-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 18:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mo, R. Y.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Philosphy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/?p=498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*The central point is mass society and pluralist society can be measured in identical terms. . (Zero). Two Equilibriums (zero meaning empirically impossible): (1). Absolute Identity; (2). Absolute Non-Identity. None of them assumes domination .　 (I). Two modes of domination: (1). Domination (A) through identity, with an element of (b) in it [hereafter as (A-b)]; <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=atinimoodyman.wordpress.com&amp;blog=4749977&amp;post=498&amp;subd=atinimoodyman&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/05/25/some-very-brief-notes-on-totalitarianism-and-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f895081223e2f4cdeece5b0f1047a4d3?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Roger</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bauman&#8217;s Criticism of Social-causal Explanation of Moral Norms</title>
		<link>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/05/19/baumans-criticism-of-social-causal-explanation-of-moral-norms/</link>
		<comments>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/05/19/baumans-criticism-of-social-causal-explanation-of-moral-norms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 20:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mo, R. Y.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anthropology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[社会理論]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[社会学]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dialectics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Durkheim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Formalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[French Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hegel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[哲学]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/?p=492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bauman&#8217;s criticism of Durkheim in chapter 7 of Modernity and the Holocaust seems unjustifiable, for there&#8217;s involved an asymmetrical formalization of the latter&#8217;s substantive language. In Durkheim, morality and conscience collective certainly have a normative connotation; immorality is seen as abnormal and hence as a failure of social integration. Bauman, however, formalizes this language in an unbalanced <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=atinimoodyman.wordpress.com&amp;blog=4749977&amp;post=492&amp;subd=atinimoodyman&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/05/19/baumans-criticism-of-social-causal-explanation-of-moral-norms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f895081223e2f4cdeece5b0f1047a4d3?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Roger</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A note on Luhmann</title>
		<link>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/05/11/a-note-on-luhmann/</link>
		<comments>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/05/11/a-note-on-luhmann/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 06:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mo, R. Y.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anthropology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georg Simmel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Weber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niklas Luhmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systems theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talcott Parsons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems rather bizarre for Luhmann to say that law&#8217;s function proper is to produce and maintain normative expectations. For, law, in a circular, though not closed, relationship with itself, is also in itself this very normativity, and indeed, Luhmann himself admits that the normativity of expectations is sustained by dissent/deviation/disappointment management which is the <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=atinimoodyman.wordpress.com&amp;blog=4749977&amp;post=486&amp;subd=atinimoodyman&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/05/11/a-note-on-luhmann/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f895081223e2f4cdeece5b0f1047a4d3?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Roger</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A priori consideration of methodology</title>
		<link>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/05/02/a-priori-consideration-of-methodology/</link>
		<comments>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/05/02/a-priori-consideration-of-methodology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 16:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mo, R. Y.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cultural and Media Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cultural Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Weber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[方法論]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/?p=482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any a priori evaluation of the epistemological validity of certain logical and conceptual categories, rather than being an evaluation with a proclivity to &#8216;reify&#8217; them, is and ought to be a deconstructive re-evaluation; it is deconstructive precisely in the sense that the logical categories under consideration are in (rather than &#8216;for&#8217;) themselves results of a <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=atinimoodyman.wordpress.com&amp;blog=4749977&amp;post=482&amp;subd=atinimoodyman&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/05/02/a-priori-consideration-of-methodology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f895081223e2f4cdeece5b0f1047a4d3?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Roger</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quotes from Legislators and Interpreters (Bauman)</title>
		<link>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/04/13/quotes-from-legislators-and-interpreters/</link>
		<comments>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/04/13/quotes-from-legislators-and-interpreters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mo, R. Y.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anthropology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cultural and Media Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cartesian Dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[社会理論]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[社会学]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Descartes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hegel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[哲学]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/?p=476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The control over fate proposed by the religious formulators was thus mediated by knowledge from the very start; a crucial element of the operation, as Radin insists, was the &#8216;transference of coercive power from the subject to the object&#8217;. Once the determinants of fate have been objectified, once the subject&#8217;s will has been denied the <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=atinimoodyman.wordpress.com&amp;blog=4749977&amp;post=476&amp;subd=atinimoodyman&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://atinimoodyman.wordpress.com/2011/04/13/quotes-from-legislators-and-interpreters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f895081223e2f4cdeece5b0f1047a4d3?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Roger</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
