An idle blogger

後で書く

Points to make:

1. To what extent can one argue that the rules of intuition belong solely to sensibility?

2. To what extent can one argue that the categories of original apperception belong to the understanding alone?

3. Or, do these two questions simply not make sense at all?

4. Does the negative answer to this question lead to Nishida’s 「直観」「直接経験」？

To No. 1 & 2, note 32 in the Critique of Pure Reason (Cambridge Edition of Kant’s works) seems to imply that Kant did not manage to elaborate on these questions in a way satisfactory enough for himself. And editor’s footnote on p. 239 states that even today the answer to question No. 1 remains controversial.